UPDATED · News · 28 Mar 2026 · MTW News Desk
Apple has quietly confirmed what many in the professional computing world feared but few expected to happen this soon: Mac Pro discontinued. There will be no successor to the current model, no redesign, no transition to a new chip generation. The tower workstation that once defined professional computing is being permanently retired, and Apple apparently has no plans to replace it with anything. For creative professionals who built their workflows around Apple’s most powerful desktop, this is not just disappointing, it is a betrayal.

The Mac Pro’s Slow and Painful Decline
The writing has been on the wall for years, but Apple kept offering just enough hope to prevent a mass exodus. The 2019 Mac Pro, with its distinctive cheese-grater design and modular architecture, was supposed to be Apple’s recommitment to professional users after the disastrous trash can model of 2013. It was expandable, repairable, and outrageously expensive. The Apple Silicon refresh in 2023 moved the tower to an M2 Ultra chip, with the current Mac Pro languishing at its £5530 (about $6,999) starting price point ever since, as 9to5Mac confirmed.
Then Apple Silicon matured, and the Mac Pro became an awkward relic. The 2023 refresh added an M2 Ultra chip but stripped out the one thing that made the Mac Pro worth its astronomical price for many buyers: support for third-party PCIe GPUs. Without that capability, the Mac Pro became little more than a Mac Studio in a larger, more expensive enclosure. Professionals noticed, and the box went two and a half years without an update while the Mac Studio moved on to the M3 Ultra, as MacRumors reports.


What Comes Next for Apple’s Desktop Lineup
With the Mac Pro gone, Apple’s desktop range consists of the Mac mini, Mac Studio, and iMac, three machines that, despite their different form factors, share remarkably similar internal architectures. The Mac Studio becomes Apple’s de facto professional desktop, as Bloomberg reports, and future updates will likely focus on pushing its chip capabilities further rather than expanding its physical design. For more, see our news coverage.
Rumours suggest Apple is exploring an M5 Extreme chip that would combine multiple M5 dies into a single package, potentially offering a significant increase in CPU and GPU core counts. If that chip materialises, it could appear in a future Mac Studio update and partially address the performance gap left by the Mac Pro’s departure. But a faster chip does not solve the expansion problem, and for professionals who need specialised hardware, no amount of integrated performance compensates for the loss of PCIe slots. For more, see our editorials.

The Mac Pro was never Apple’s best-selling product. It was something more important: a statement of intent, a signal that Apple took professional users seriously. By killing it without a replacement, Apple is sending a different signal entirely, one that says consumer margins matter more than professional loyalty. History may judge that as a smart business decision. But the professionals who built careers on Apple hardware will remember it as the moment Cupertino stopped caring about them.
Why Apple killing the Mac Pro with no replacement is a bigger deal than Apple admits
Apple killing the Mac Pro outright with no announced replacement is the loudest “we no longer care about this customer” signal Apple has sent in a decade. The pro tower has always been a small-volume product, but it has historically served an outsized role as a halo machine for film, audio and scientific computing studios. By discontinuing it without even a “Mac Pro 2 coming next year” placeholder, Apple is telling a pretty important slice of its professional user base that the high-end workstation conversation is over.
The Mac Studio has absorbed most of the Mac Pro’s capability story, and for the average creative professional that is genuinely a fine outcome. The M-series Ultra silicon delivers performance that the old Intel Mac Pro could only dream of, in a chassis that fits on a desk and does not sound like a server rack at idle. For ninety per cent of former Mac Pro buyers, a fully-specced Mac Studio is the right answer, and Apple is correct that the upgrade is worth taking.
The remaining ten per cent are the problem. PCIe expansion for niche capture cards, GPU compute for workloads that need raw matrix throughput, internal storage arrays that the Mac Studio simply cannot accommodate, these are the workflows the Mac Pro existed to serve, and there is no current Apple Silicon machine that replaces them. Killing the Mac Pro with no replacement in sight is, for those users, an instruction to switch to Windows or Linux, and Apple seems to have decided it is fine with that loss.
Related reading on MTW
Buyer action
Where to buy or check next
Use this as the final check before ordering a phone, changing network or trusting a headline monthly price.
















Reader discussion
Leave a comment
Comments are moderated. Keep it useful, accurate, and on topic.